El ángulo papila-fóvea y la torsión ocular compensatoria, clave en su interpretación / Disc-foveal angle and ocular counterrolling as a key in its interpretation

OBJETIVO: Describir una técnica rápida para medir el ángulo papila-fóvea (APF), determinar sus valores normales y su relevancia a la hora de analizar retinografías apareadas. MÉTODOS: En 20 sujetos se realizaron 440 retinografías (3 D OCT-2000, Topcon Corporation, Tokio, Japón) en 11 posiciones diferentes de la cabeza (cervical range of motion [CROM], Performance Attainment Associates). Se analizó el APF mediante el programa Keynote v.6.2.2 y se estudió la reproducibilidad y correlación entre los retinógrafos 3 D OCT-2000 y TRC-50EX (Topcon Corporation, Tokio, Japón). RESULTADOS: La media del APF en el ojo derecho (OD) y en el ojo izquierdo (OI) fue de 5,5 ± 3,4° y de 8,6 ± 2,9°, con una diferencia de 3,1° (p = 0,001 test del signo-rango de Wilcoxon). La media de la diferencia absoluta del APF entre ambos ojos fue de 3,5 ± 2,6°; aumentando con la inclinación cefálica en el plano frontal (p = 0,000 test del signo-rango de Wilcoxon). La media de la suma del APF de ambos ojos fue de 14,1 ± 5,4°. La media de la torsión ocular compensatoria (TOC) con la cabeza inclinada 20 y 40° a la derecha fue de 7,1 y 12,2° en el OD y de 7,7 y 12,1° en el OI. Con la cabeza inclinada 20 y 40° a la izquierda, la media fue de 4,4 y 8° en el OD y de 4,2 y 8,7° en el OI (p = 0,000 test del signo-rango de Wilcoxon). Los retinógrafos mostraron alta correlación y reproducibilidad. CONCLUSIÓN: Nuestra técnica es rápida y reproducible. El OI muestra mayor APF que el OD. La TOC solo ocurre en el plano frontal. Estos aspectos son relevantes al analizar retinografías apareadas

PURPOSE: Describe a time-sparing technique to measure disc-foveal angle (DFA), determine normal values and its role when analyzing paired fundus photographs. METHODS: DFA was analysed using the software program Keynote v.6.2.2 on 440 fundus photographs (3 D OCT 2000, Topcon Corporation, Tokio, Japan) of 20 individuals. The 11 different head positions were determined with the cervical range of motion device (CROM, Performance Attainment Associates). A reproducibility and correlation study between two fundus cameras (OCT 3 D-2000 and TRC-50EX, Topcon Corporation, Tokio, Japan) was performed. RESULTS: Mean DFA of the right and left eye was 5.5 ± 3.4° and 8.6 ± 2.9°, with a difference of 3.1° (P = 0.001 Wilcoxon signed-rank test) in the upright head position. Mean absolute difference in DFA between eyes was 3.5 ± 2.6°; an increase was seen with increasing head tilt (p = 0.000 Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Mean sum of DFA in both eyes was 14.1 ± 5.4°. On head-tilt of 20° and 40° to the right, mean ocular counterrolling (OCR) was 7.1° and 12.2° in the right eye and 7.7° and 12.1° in the left eye. On head-tilt of 20° and 40° to the left, OCR was 4.4° and 8° in the right eye and 4.2° and 8.7° in the left eye (P = 0.000 Wilcoxon signed-rank test). The two cameras showed strong correlation and high reproducibility. CONCLUSIONS: Our DFA measurement technique is time-sparing and reproducible. Left eye shows higher DFA than right eye. OCR occurs only in the roll plane. This information is of value when analyzing paired fundus photographs

Disc-foveal angle and ocular counterrolling as a key in its interpretation. / El ángulo papila-fóvea y la torsión ocular compensatoria, clave en su interpretación.

PURPOSE: Describe a time-sparing technique to measure disc-foveal angle (DFA), determine normal values and its role when analyzing paired fundus photographs. METHODS: DFA was analysed using the software program Keynote v.6.2.2 on 440 fundus photographs (3D OCT 2000, Topcon Corporation, Tokio, Japan) of 20 individuals. The 11 different head positions were determined with the cervical range of motion device (CROM, Performance Attainment Associates). A reproducibility and correlation study between two fundus cameras (OCT 3D-2000 and TRC-50EX, Topcon Corporation, Tokio, Japan) was performed. RESULTS: Mean DFA of the right and left eye was 5.5±3.4° and 8.6±2.9°, with a difference of 3.1° (P=0.001 Wilcoxon signed-rank test) in the upright head position. Mean absolute difference in DFA between eyes was 3.5±2.6°; an increase was seen with increasing head tilt (P=0.000 Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Mean sum of DFA in both eyes was 14.1±5.4°. On head-tilt of 20° and 40° to the right, mean ocular counterrolling (OCR) was 7.1° and 12.2° in the right eye and 7.7° and 12.1° in the left eye. On head-tilt of 20° and 40° to the left, OCR was 4.4° and 8° in the right eye and 4.2° and 8.7° in the left eye (P=0.000 Wilcoxon signed-rank test). The two cameras showed strong correlation and high reproducibility. CONCLUSIONS: Our DFA measurement technique is time-sparing and reproducible. Left eye shows higher DFA than right eye. OCR occurs only in the roll plane. This information is of value when analyzing paired fundus photographs.

Eficacia del tratamiento inmunomodulador con interferón-β o acetato de glatirámero en las uveítis asociadas a esclerosis múltiple / Efficacy of immunomodulatory therapy with interferon-β or glatiramer acetate on multiple sclerosis-associated uveitis

Objetivo: Analizar la eficacia del interferón-β o acetato de glatirámero en reducir los episodios de inflamación intraocular en pacientes con uveítis asociada a esclerosis múltiple. Método: Estudio no aleatorizado, retrospectivo de serie de casos de 13 pacientes con diagnóstico definitivo de esclerosis múltiple y uveítis (seguimiento mínimo, 12 meses). Todos los pacientes fueron tratados con terapia inmunomoduladora (interferón-β o acetato de glatirámero) para controlar el curso de la esclerosis múltiple. Los pacientes fueron comparados con ellos mismos antes de iniciar el tratamiento inmunomodulador para valorar la diferencia en los episodios de uveítis. Variable principal de medida: número de episodios de uveítis con/sin tratamiento inmunomodulador. Resultados: Los brotes de uveítis fueron bilaterales en 10 de 13 pacientes (77%). Once pacientes fueron clasificados como uveítis intermedias, 3 pacientes como vasculitis retiniana y un paciente como uveítis posterior. Los pacientes tuvieron una media de 4,15±3,1 episodios de uveítis (rango 1-10) a lo largo del seguimiento (148,6±84,3 meses). Los pacientes bajo tratamiento con interferón-β o acetato de glatirámero mostraron una reducción significativa de 0,36 episodios de inflamación intraocular al año (p = 0,02) comparados con ellos mismos antes de iniciar el tratamiento. Seis pacientes (46%) mostraron efectos secundarios leves asociados al tratamiento inmunomodulador (3 pacientes [23%] síndrome seudogripal; 3 pacientes [23%] rash cutáneo). Conclusiones: El interferón-β o acetato de glatirámero podrían ser efectivos en reducir los brotes de inflamación intraocular en pacientes con uveítis asociada a esclerosis múltiple, siendo bien tolerados por la mayoría de los pacientes (AU)

Aim: To analyse the role of interferon-β or glatiramer acetate in reducing the inflammatory episodes of intra-ocular inflammation in multiple sclerosis-associated uveitis. Method: A study was conducted on a non-randomised, retrospective case series of 13 patients with proven multiple sclerosis and uveitis (minimum follow-up, 12 months). All patients were given immunomodulatory treatment (interferon-β or glatiramer acetate) to control the course of the multiple sclerosis. Patients were compared to themselves before initiating the treatment, in order to assess the difference in uveitis episodes. The main outcome measurements were the number of uveitis episodes with/without immunomodulatory treatment. Results: Uveitis was bilateral in 10 (77%) out of 13 patients. Intermediate uveitis was observed in 11 patients, retinal vasculitis in 3 patients, and one patient was classified as a posterior uveitis. The patients had a mean of 4.15±3.1 episodes of uveitis (range 1-10) during the follow-up period (148.6±84.3 months). When compared to their pre-treatment status, patients on treatment with interferon-β or glatiramer acetate showed a significant decrease of 0.36 episodes of ocular inflammation per year (P =.02). Mild side effects related to immunomodulatory treatment were observed in 6 (46%) patients, 3 (23%) patients with a flu-like syndrome, and 3 (23%) patients with a skin rash. Conclusions: Interferon β or glatiramer acetate could be effective in reducing the uveitis episodes in patients with multiple sclerosis-associated uveitis, and was well tolerated in most patients (AU)

Efficacy of immunomodulatory therapy with interferon-ß or glatiramer acetate on multiple sclerosis-associated uveitis. / Eficacia del tratamiento inmunomodulador con interferón-ß o acetato de glatirámero en las uveítis asociadas a esclerosis múltiple.

AIM: To analyse the role of interferon-ß or glatiramer acetate in reducing the inflammatory episodes of intra-ocular inflammation in multiple sclerosis-associated uveitis. METHOD: A study was conducted on a non-randomised, retrospective case series of 13 patients with proven multiple sclerosis and uveitis (minimum follow-up, 12 months). All patients were given immunomodulatory treatment (interferon-ß or glatiramer acetate) to control the course of the multiple sclerosis. Patients were compared to themselves before initiating the treatment, in order to assess the difference in uveitis episodes. The main outcome measurements were the number of uveitis episodes with/without immunomodulatory treatment. RESULTS: Uveitis was bilateral in 10 (77%) out of 13 patients. Intermediate uveitis was observed in 11 patients, retinal vasculitis in 3 patients, and one patient was classified as a posterior uveitis. The patients had a mean of 4.15±3.1 episodes of uveitis (range 1-10) during the follow-up period (148.6±84.3 months). When compared to their pre-treatment status, patients on treatment with interferon-ß or glatiramer acetate showed a significant decrease of 0.36 episodes of ocular inflammation per year (P=.02). Mild side effects related to immunomodulatory treatment were observed in 6 (46%) patients, 3 (23%) patients with a flu-like syndrome, and 3 (23%) patients with a skin rash. CONCLUSIONS: Interferon ß or glatiramer acetate could be effective in reducing the uveitis episodes in patients with multiple sclerosis-associated uveitis, and was well tolerated in most patients.

Bevacizumab intravítreo en neovascularización coroidea asociada a enfermedad de Best / Intravitreal bevacizumab for choroidal neovascularization associated with Best's disease

CASO CLÍNICO: Mujer de 27 años que presentaba disminución de visión en ojo derecho (20/200). El examen funduscópico reveló una hemorragia intrarretiniana macular con desprendimiento neurosensorial en ojo derecho, y un depósito de material viteliforme en el ojo izquierdo. La angiografía fluoresceínica y el electrooculograma confirmaron el diagnóstico de neovascularización coroidea asociada a enfermedad de Best. Cuatro semanas después de una única inyección de bevacizumab intravítreo, la agudeza visual a la normalidad (20/25) y se mantuvo estable tras 12 meses de seguimiento. DISCUSIÓN: El bevacizumab intravítreo puede ser una opción terapéutica eficaz en la neovascularización coroidea secundaria a enfermedad de Best

CASE REPORT: A 27-year old woman presented with loss of vision in the right eye (20/200). Ophthalmoscopic examination showed intrarretinal hemorrhage in the macular region with neurosensory detachment in the right eye, and viteliform deposit on the left eye. Fluorescein angiography and the electrooculogram confirmed the diagnosis of choroidal neovascularization associated with Best's disease. Four weeks after a single bevacizumab intravitreal injection, visual acuity was restored (20/25) and remained stable after a 12 month follow-up. DISCUSSION: Intravitreal bevacizumab appears to be an effective treatment for choroidal neovascularization associated to Best's disease

[Intravitreal bevacizumab for choroidal neovascularization associated with Best's disease]. / Bevacizumab intravítreo en neovascularización coroidea asociada a enfermedad de Best.

CASE REPORT: A 27-year old woman presented with loss of vision in the right eye (20/200). Ophthalmoscopic examination showed intrarretinal hemorrhage in the macular region with neurosensory detachment in the right eye, and viteliform deposit on the left eye. Fluorescein angiography and the electrooculogram confirmed the diagnosis of choroidal neovascularization associated with Best's disease. Four weeks after a single bevacizumab intravitreal injection, visual acuity was restored (20/25) and remained stable after a 12 month follow-up. DISCUSSION: Intravitreal bevacizumab appears to be an effective treatment for choroidal neovascularization associated to Best's disease.